Search This Blog

Saturday, February 25, 2017

Editorial: Pro-Life Movement is Anti-Woman

Mark Reinhardt- Boise Idaho

A man has no place in what a Woman does with her body. It is up to the woman, whether or not she wants to keep the baby in the first place. Lets focus on the Financial aspect that a Pro-Life policy would have on society. It costs money to take care of a baby. If the woman can't afford to have the baby, it is her right to abort period.

Pro-Life policies will cost the Tax Payer more money, especially, when it comes to Foster Care costs and the child not being wanted by the parent in the first place. The net cost of Child Birth is already a undue hardship on the mother. Women cannot depend on men financially to take care of the child in the first place.  More often than not, sex, is seen as a pleasurable experience laced with lack of responsibility on the part of the man.

Unless the Tax Payer wants to pay for the child care, and the healthcare of a child after birth. Its best to let the woman chose what she wants to do with that baby.